Aardvark Numerology

Things have been going extremely well since we started allowing open signups a month ago.

So we’ve put together a few benchmarks to evaluate progress on our core metrics — the challenge is only how to interpret the numbers…

  • Aardvark is Fast
    8 minutes – median EMS response time (hopefully)
    4 minutes 30 seconds – median time to first Aardvark answer
    It’s reassuring to know that we can help with book recommendations, fashion advice, and gardening ideas more quickly than 911 can respond to life-threatening emergencies.
  • Aardvark is Vast
    308,000 – Library of Congress Subject Headings and References
    353,873 – Aardvark topics users can answer questions about
    At face value, these numbers seem to indicate that the Aardvark community now covers the full extent of world knowledge… and then some. Hmm… perhaps the additional expertise is about esoteric musicians or ancient religious customs or…?
  • Aardvarkers are Helpful
    2% – Wikipedia visitors that have contributed original content to Wikipedia
    87% – New Aardvark users this month who answered a question when asked
    This is actually a stat we’re really proud of. While there is an enormous quantity of helpful information on the web, it is authored by a small minority of internet users. Aardvark provides a way to access all of the knowledge that everyone has — especially the people in your network. Everyone has interesting experiences to share, and enjoys being helpful, given the right opportunity.
  • Aardvark is Active
    18,000,000 – calls to NYC 311 last month
    1,611,437 – messages exchanged with Aardvark last month
    These numbers make me dizzy. I guess we still have a little ways to go here…
  • Aardvark is Addictive
    3.1 – Average number of cups that a coffee addict consumes a day
    8.4 – Average number of times users type ‘try’ in a row
    Back on the helpfulness theme: it’s really gratifying to be sent a question from someone in your network who has a need right now, and to be able to help them by typing a quick note in the moment. Aardvark is a way to facilitate these kinds of episodes — we sometimes think of it as a “goodwill engine”.
  • Aardvark is Magic
    15% – Attempts to start conversations at bars that are successful (Rob’s personal experience)
    86% – Aardvark questions that are successfully answered
    A key value of Aardvark is that it acts as a social intermediary: you don’t have to bother everyone on your email list with questions, or feel awkward about asking an acquaintance for a favor. Instead, just start the conversation with Aardvark, and Aardvark will find someone who is available and happy to respond right away.
  • Aardvark is Global
    119 – Number of countries with McDonald’s
    121 – Number of countries with Aardvark users
    Ask globally, eat locally. Maybe try asking Aardvark for a restaurant recommendation…

17 Comments

  1. Chris Ferrara
    Posted July 31, 2009 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    I like it. Great breakdown!

  2. Jeremy K
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    it’s fun to read the numbers here (I’m glad to see such quick response times and high proportion of sentences answered).

    re: number of topics, I think there’s a certain statistical sleight-of-hand in this presentation. the LoC curates their topic headings for various reasons, including attempting to reduce the possibility that the same topic will be in two places.

    Aardvark is surely *not* doing such curation; even with clever normalizations, there are probably redundancies like “auto repair” and “car service”. You’ve got some way to go before you’ve caught up with the LoC!

    BUT: it would be really cool to have a visualization tool for what topics in the LoC are populated with Aardvark users and what aren’t. (it has a collection of interesting sub-questions, such as matchmaking between vark topics and LoC or other topic headings.) Any chance of publishing the available topics in a mashable format?

  3. Arkaninger
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    That’s amazing!!

    But, since “121 – Number of countries with Aardvark users”, I wonder why we users cannot ask questions in any other language than English.

    What if it is ourselves who tag the question, so Aardvark soft has not to analyze it?

    Even it could be possible to the users to specify in our profile what languages we’d like to answer, couldn’t it?

    Just hoping!

    Regards.

  4. Jeremy
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    That’s great to hear you guys are keeping such good track of everything. I’m curious as to what the breakdown of user engagement is. For example I’m nearly always connected to Aardvark via IM, and answer questions whenever I’m able, though haven’t yet asked one. In contrast others using just email might have a different level of engagement.

  5. Damon, Lion Tamer
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Definitely there are differences in curation between Aardvark and LoC… but we’ll catch up eventually :)
    Would be great to hear more about your visualization of topics idea — if you want to, go ahead and post it in our community forum (http://community.vark.com/), and see if it can get voted up the list…

  6. Damon, Lion Tamer
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Absolutely — it’s just a matter of time before we can support additional languages.
    (If you want to add your votes to help prioritize this, visit http://community.vark.com/pages/18354-general/suggestions/261217-more-languages)

  7. Damon, Lion Tamer
    Posted August 1, 2009 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    You’re right, Jeremy: Aardvarkers are most active over IM, asking and answering questions; we get many fewer emailed questions, though we do get quite a few emailed answers.

  8. Posted August 6, 2009 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    Heh, maybe the bar thing is you, not an innate property of the bar?

    Just kidding folks…

  9. Posted August 8, 2009 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Interesting numbers indeed - and aardvark is definitely off to a good start :)

    Of course, like any other communication channel in human history, when it gains enough traction it breeds spam. I’m not looking forward to the day when I ask a question about penicillin and get a response from a viagra bot.

    So I am curious to see how you handle the critical mass volumes that foster spam. I guess it’s just a matter of waiting ;)

    ~ Wogan

  10. Posted August 19, 2009 at 1:16 am | Permalink

    Hi,

    I created quite a large list of people according to their numerological number.
    You can see the list here:
    http://www.whatwasdone.com/NumerologyDir.php

    I’m afraid that I’m not too familiar with numerology, beside the very computation.
    do you find these list useful?

    Are there other improvements you suggest that I’ll add?

    Thanks,
    What Was Done

  11. Posted October 15, 2009 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    Vark is great!!! i love it. But will it add chinese version for china users? Thank you!

  12. numerology
    Posted May 20, 2010 at 3:07 am | Permalink

    hey guys, check out this new forum, its really good for free numerology. http://www.numerology-astrology.com.au

  13. Posted June 9, 2010 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    I like it. Great breakdown!

  14. Posted June 9, 2010 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    Vark is great!!! i love it. But will it add chinese version for china users? Thank you!

  15. Posted June 9, 2010 at 1:52 am | Permalink

    I just want to thanks, thanks you!

  16. james
    Posted July 8, 2010 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    hello all

  17. Posted July 14, 2010 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    so great ~Vark is great!!! i love it. But will it add chinese version for china users? Thank you!

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Aardvark Numerology http://blog.vark.com/?p=126 в Любими преди 2 минути edno23.com Начало контакти [...]

  2. [...] Aardvark Numerology – (tags: aardvark statistics ) [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>